Re: "type" attribute of DvProportion: ProportionKind or Integer??
Hi Leo, It's a common java idiom to use enumeration instead of int in such situation. The consequence, as you observed is that the mismatch now between the object model in java, ADL and XML must be dealt with. Cheers, Rong On 27 July 2010 15:24, Moretti Leonardo <lmoretti@noemalife.com> wrote: > Hi all, > I'd like to report a particular problem which is creating trouble... > In class DvProportion: "type" attribute is defined as ProportionKind, > while in > http://www.openehr.org/releases/1.0.2/architecture/rm/data_types_im.pdf > is defined as Integer. Also in archetype model, "type" attribute of a > C_COMPLEX_OBJECT of rm-type DV_PROPORTION is defined as CInteger > (http://www.openehr.org/wsvn/ref_impl_java/TRUNK/openehr-aom/src/main/java/org/openehr/am/archetype/constraintmodel/primitive/CInteger.java) > I look at archetype node id at0006 of > openEHR-EHR-OBSERVATION.indirect_oximetry.v1 in > http://openehr.org/knowledge/ to have an example. > > Using the enumeration instead of an Integer can cause some problems, > for > example if I try to validate an instance of DvProportion (validValue > method of CInteger class returns false..)! > > Morevor I noted that Integer is mapped in XML-Schemas as xs:integer > (http://www.openehr.org/releases/1.0.2/its/XML-schema/documentation/BaseTypes.xsd.html#h1328923170). > If we'll use Integer in Java class, it is more correct to use xs:int > in > XML-Schemas, because they have the same definiton and range of values. > Otherwise if we use xs.integer in XML-Schemas, we should use > java.math.BigInteger in Java class! > > Regards > leo > _______________________________________________ > Ref_impl_java mailing list > Ref_impl_java@openehr.org > http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/ref_impl_java > _______________________________________________ Ref_impl_java mailing list Ref_impl_java@openehr.org http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/ref_impl_java