RE: Adding a new method to the Archetype class
|
Great, now I have this working defining the term for the Instruction.narrative in the term bindings. Thanks a lot! Cheers, PAblo. Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 11:20:31 +0000 From: thomas.beale@oceaninformatics.com To: ref_impl_java@openehr.org Subject: Re: Adding a new method to the Archetype class On 30/01/2010 05:04, pablo pazos wrote: Hi Thomas, the ontology section of the archetype defines the 'meaning' of each at-code. The meaning of each node is inferred from its path - i.e. you need to think of a path as a post-coordination of terms.
well there are quite a few single-valued attributes in the model, like CARE_ENTRY.protocol, the narrative one you mention and so on. They don't need at-codes, because they don't have siblings - siblings can only exist under container attributes (like CLUSTER.items for example). So the correct path for an object under the 'narrative' attribute is simply '/narrative' (relative to the Instruction root).
the point of the ontology is to define the at-code meanings - as I say, the node meanings are inferred. Note that in the bindings section you can use at-codes or paths, enabling external terms to be bound to particular paths, e.g. 5 min ave systolic BP or so. hope this helps - thomas Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection. Sign up now. |
_______________________________________________ Ref_impl_java mailing list Ref_impl_java@openehr.org http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/ref_impl_java