Re: Bug in adl-parser

[Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil.h.y@gmail.com>]

Hi Rong,

I got it and sorry for the inconvenience. This is the matter null  
(optional) and empty (required but 0 in size).

Bests,
Soheil
On Aug 29, 2009, at 10:48 PM, Rong Chen wrote:

> Hi Soheil,
>
> Actually the parser is correct as is. Cardinality {0..*} doesn't mean
> existence is optional. Cardinality and existence describe two
> different constraints here. A container attribute can be required
> (existence matches {1}) and has from 0 to many members.
>
> Cheers,
> Rong
>
> 2009/8/28 Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil.h.y@gmail.com>:
> > Hi There,
> > There is a bug in adl-parser project about the existence of  
> > archetypes
> > nodes. If a node exists with cardinality {0..*}, it is implicit  
> > that the
> > node is OPTIONAL, but the parser consider it as REQUIRED. For
> > example relationships is not necessary as defined in the following  
> > line but
> > the ADLParser mark it as required.
> > relationships cardinality matches {0..*; ordered} matches {
> > The problem can be solved simply. Please find the patch attached.
> > Bests,
> > Soheil
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ref_impl_java mailing list
> > Ref_impl_java@openehr.org
> > http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/ref_impl_java
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ref_impl_java mailing list
> Ref_impl_java@openehr.org
> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/ref_impl_java