Re: Error on DvOrdered, ref impl or in specs?
Hi Pablo, The UML version of the specs is not update-to-date. If you look at the PDF version of the specs, it is exactly the same as the Java implementation. Cheers, Rong 2009/8/20 Pablo Pazos Gutierrez <pazospablo@hotmail.com>: > Hi Rong, > > In DvOrdered from java ref impl I found a diference between the fields > declared here and the fields in the specs from UML here> > http://www.openehr.org/svn/specification/TAGS/Release-1.0.1/publishing/architecture/computable/UML/uml_start_view.html > > DvOrdered in java ref impl have> > > > List > > <ReferenceRange<T>> otherReferenceRanges; > DvInterval<T> normalRange; > > But in the UML specs says> > > List<DvInterval> otherRefereceneRanges; > ReferenceRange<T> normalRange; > > If you see, the DvInterval and ReferenceRange are changed, is it a > specs > error? > > > > Cheers, > Pablo. > > > ------ > Atte. > A/C Pablo Pazos Gutierrez > www.SimpleWebPortal.net > http://YuppFramework.blogspot.com > http://groups.google.com/group/yuppframeworkphp > _______________________________________________ > Ref_impl_java mailing list > Ref_impl_java@openehr.org > http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/ref_impl_java > >