Re: findMatchingRMClass
> <br> > I am interested to know what you are using this type matching method > for - I have never had to write anyhting like this - in our parser > software, we always know what the type of the object is a priori.<br> > <br> There are some untyped dADL-files in the java-project, and I was wondering if I should support them, this because I want to stay as close as possible to the java-reference implementation. But supporting them took me already several days, and was unreliable (in my case), so I stopped (for now) supporting them, it is very easy to work around (just put the types in it). Although, there is a problem. Because want to use dadl as a format for data-transport, for example from an application to the orm layer (also passing the rm-builder to create RM-types) This is OK, when I have everything under control, but I want the kernel I am writing also to be connectible to software (GUI's, other data-entry-machines) from third parties, and I want them to use DADL, but in that case, the spec, which does not require types is working against me. So if this point could be changed in the spec, I would be happy, but if it cannot, then I have to live with it (and add an extra restriction). Bert _______________________________________________ Ref_impl_java mailing list Ref_impl_java@openehr.org http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/ref_impl_java