Skip to Navigation | Skip to Content

openEHR-Technical mailing list archives

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: IHTSDO meeting - term binding presentation available


Hi All,

As written below most of IHTSDO:s activities are currently performed 
inside
IHTSDO:s "Collaborative space" (also known as "Basecamp"). This
Collaborative space is a legacy system from before IHTSDO acquired 
SNOMED CT
and probably not the best system due to the current needs, but the 
system is
still there because of lack of time to change system. However, there 
are now
ongoing discussions and there seems to be a new project initiated to
supplement or replace the current Collaborative space to make it easier 
for
people outside IHTSDO:s groups to get information and share resources.

More information about how to get access to the Collaborative space is, 
as
written below, available at
http://www.ihtsdo.org/about-ihtsdo/collaborative-space/. The currently
existing Special Interest Groups at the Collaborative space are:

Anesthesia Special Interest Group
Concept Model Special Interest Group
Education Special Interest Group
Implementation SIG
International Pathology & Laboratory Medicine SIG
Machine & Human Readable Concept Model Project
Mapping SNOMED CT to ICD-10 Project
Nursing Special Interest Group
Pharmacy Special Interest Group
Primary Care Special Interest Group
Translation Special Interest Group

And the currently existing project groups are:

Anatomy Model Project
Collaborative Editing Project Group
Enhanced Release Format, Interchange Format & RefSet PG
Event, Condition and Episode Model Project
Workbench RefSet Module Project
Observable and Investigation Model Project
Organism & Infectious Disease Model Project
Pre-coordination Roadmap Project
Request Submission Project
Substance Hierarchy Redesign Project
Translation Standard Processes Project

There are also a affiliate forum.

        Greetings,
        Mikael


-----Original Message-----
From: openehr-clinical-bounces@chime.ucl.ac.uk
[mailto:openehr-clinical-bounces@chime.ucl.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Eric 
Browne
Sent: den 6 maj 2010 13:20
To: For openEHR clinical discussions
Cc: For openEHR clinical discussions; Openehr-Technical
Subject: Re: IHTSDO meeting - term binding presentation available

Hi Sebastian, 

If I can give my own perspective on this, having been peripherally 
involved
for some time..

1. Unfortunately, the IHTSDO (www.ihtsdo.org), who is responsible for 
the
ongoing management and development of SNOMED CT, is still a somewhat 
closed
and traditional standards development organisation. It has no publicly
accessible wiki of resources à la openEHR. It does, however, have a
substantial community of individuals from member countries and affiliate
organisations and several collaborative websites and mailing lists where
ideas, contributions, new specifications etc. are documented and 
evolve. I
would guess that the majority of participants are either active in other
standards development organisations, or staff/affiliates of member 
nation
health informatics programs such as the UK's NHS Connecting for Health
Program, Canada's Infoway, Australia's National E-Health Transition
Authority, etc.

2. For many years prior to IHTSDO taking over SNOMED CT from the 
College of
American Pathologists, SNOMED CT embraced a mechanism and format for
producing "subsets" of SNOMED CT. About 18 months ago, proposals for a 
new
SNOMED release format and a new Reference Set format (to replace the old
subset mechanism) emerged and evolved. These two proposals morphed into 
a
single umbrella specification called Release Format 2, which has now 
reached
Draft for Trial Use status within the IHTSDO. One of the specification
documents covers Reference Set formats and is available in part 2 of 
RF2 at:
http://www.ihtsdo.org/publications/draft-for-review-and-trial-use/ .  
This
draft specification includes support for "language refsets", which may 
be of
particular interest to you. Access to the collaborative space where 
these
documents are made available is described at:
http://www.ihtsdo.org/about-ihtsdo/collaborative-space/ .

3. To my knowledge there is no formal IHTSDO proposal for a query 
language
to express Refset membership specifications. However, the IHTSDO 
Terminology
Workbench does incorporate quite a sophisticated mechanism for building
refsets using an underlying ( and evolving) query-based expression 
language.
Note: these refsets do not necessarily need to be specific to SNOMED. 
The
refset specifications, however, are currently designed to  construct  
static
files for distribution alongside the SNOMED core and national extension
files, rather than for producing dynamically evaluated termsets for  
local
needs, as might be supported for openEHR templates, say.

eric
----

On 2010-05-06, at 5:48 PM, Sebastian Garde wrote:

> Hi Thomas,
> 
> do you know if there is a formal way of how RefSets (=the resulting 
> Snomed
CT codes etc.) and the RefSet query (=the query on Snomed CT to get to 
the
RefSet) are expressed and shared?
> Similar to what is described here but based on RefSets:
http://www.openehr.org/wiki/display/term/Ocean+Terminology+Query+Language+%2
8TQL%29 
> 
> I agree that RefSets are a good way forward, but they need to be
available, reusable and sharable, etc.
> 
> Sebastian
> 
> Thomas Beale wrote:
>> 
>> I attended the IHTSDO meeting just finished in Copenhagen. Things 
>> look
pretty good for where SNOMED CT is going generally - the RF2 technical
infrastructure seems relatively well designed. There is a lot of 
activity in
content modeling, the IHTSDO workbench and many other areas relevant to
openEHR. Converely, I believe openEHR will be very important to make 
SNOMED
CT work in many places, since it will be via archetypes, templates and
associated ref sets that information systems will be able to connect to
terminology in a disciplined way. I believe that ref sets are the 
future of
SNOMED CT (and any terminology for that matter) in use in real systems.
>> 
>> I was asked to present a view from openEHR about 'terminology 
>> binding',
i.e. connecting terminology and information models. My presentation is 
on
this page http://www.openehr.org/wiki/display/term/Terminology+Binding 
>> or see the following direct links:
>>      ? PDF -
http://www.openehr.org/wiki/download/attachments/5997267/openEHR_term_bindin
g_IHTSDO_april_2010.pdf
>>      ? PPTX -
http://www.openehr.org/wiki/download/attachments/5997267/openEHR_term_bindin
g_IHTSDO_april_2010.pptx
>> I hope this is useful.  I will continue to document IHTSDO-related
thoughts on the openEHR wiki, and I encourage others to do the same.
>> 
>> - thomas beale
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> openEHR-technical mailing list
>> 
>> openEHR-technical@openehr.org
>> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>> 
>>   
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-clinical mailing list
> openEHR-clinical@openehr.org
> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical


_______________________________________________
openEHR-clinical mailing list
openEHR-clinical@openehr.org
http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical


_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical@openehr.org
http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical