RE: latest archetype & template drafts
|
Hi Thomas, With your input I can state that the problems are in the tools because:
Is this correct? Pablo. Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 09:01:42 +0000 From: thomas.beale@oceaninformatics.com To: openehr-implementers@openehr.org Subject: Re: latest archetype & template drafts pablo pazos wrote: Hi Thomas, see section 5.3.7 of the ADL 1.5 draft - As for any other object constraint node, use_node constraints must have a node identifier when occurring within a container attribute, or when otherwise ambiguous within a single-valued attribute. However, rather than having to state the identifier explicitly, it is inferred from the object identifier of the target of the reference. If an identifier is required at the position of the use_node reference due to the node identification rules, the reference target must must be given a node identifier if it doesn’t already have one. In the rare case where the identifier at the reference target is also used on a sibling node of the reference, the reference must have an explicit node identifier. hope this helps - thomas Windows Live: Make it easier for your friends to see what you’re up to on Facebook. |
_______________________________________________ openEHR-implementers mailing list openEHR-implementers@openehr.org http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-implementers