Re: Clinical knowledge manager
|
Hi Derek, In order to ensure that CKM becomes a credible and authoritative source of knowledge artefacts we have have quite strict review, publication and governance processes. This is definitely not a trivial task and needs a smaller group of well-trained individuals facilitating these processes carefully to enable the community to actively collaborate on and agree these knowledge artefacts - archetypes in the first instance, templates soon, and then followed by terminology subsets. There are currently a number of defined roles and responsibilities within CKM and at present only those with Editorial role authority can add teams and upload archetypes - this is why you have not been able to access them. CKM is really not the best place to provide your students with some learning experiences, however, we can possibly offer them access to our test server/database where your students can have access to the same functionality as is currently in CKM. Here we could enable them to take on the roles and functions you are seeking without impact on the live instance of CKM. If you are interested, lets continue this discussion offline. Our desire is certainly to get more people taking on Editorial responsibility so that we can keep the momentum building and get more and more archetypes into the active review phase - currently the number of volunteer Editors is definitely a bottleneck - but only after ensuring that they have some training (more like an apprenticeship) and understand the processes that CKM has in place. Otherwise we run the risk of chaos, and the quality of the models produced might be compromised. So for anyone who is interested in taking on an Editor role, please contact me directly. Derek, I know that you have already indicated your interest in doing just this. In the near future we are also planning a more free and fluid area, the archetype 'nursery' or 'sandpit' where people can come together and collaborate on building archetypes, defining projects etc before submitting the resulting draft archetypes, templates etc into the more formal CKM review and governance process. Personally I'd love to see something like proposed Google Wave functionality here, ensuring real collaboration which would be exciting to see come to fruition, but it is still in the planning phase. Regards Heather On 29/09/2009 7:41 PM, Derek Meyer wrote: Dear ALL, I'm planning to introduce a classroom exercise on developing an archetype and uploading it to Clinical Knowledge Manager. I've investigated CKM and I can't find a way to: 1. Add St George's students as a development 'team' 2. Allow the students to register and upload their archetypes as members of this Team 3. Delete the team and all associated archetypes later. Any suggestions? Thanks, Derek. _______________________________________________ openEHR-clinical mailing list openEHR-clinical@openehr.org http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4466 (20090929) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com --
Dr Heather Leslie
MBBS FRACGP FACHI Director of Clinical Modelling Ocean Informatics Phone (Aust) +61 (0)418 966 670 Skype - heatherleslie Twitter - @omowizard |