Re: About parallel archetype editing

[Thomas Beale <thomas.beale@oceaninformatics.com>]

On 13/07/2010 07:24, Sebastian Garde wrote:

Isn't the convention that in a specialised archetype newly introduced nodes get an at code à la at0.x , e.g. at0.1 for the first?
In specialisation of a specialisation it would be at0.0.1.
For specialisation an existing node at0001 it would be at0001.1, (or at0001.0.1 if it was specialised in a specialiation of an specialised archetype), etc.

With this you don't have to decide on the number of required node codes in the parent in advance.

this is correct - all specialise at-codes are created at their depth of specialisation, i.e. with the requisite number of '.' separators. It is mathematically impossible to get mixed up between specialised at-codes and at-codes of the parent archetypes from which they were derived.

- thomas beale

_______________________________________________
openEHR-clinical mailing list
openEHR-clinical@openehr.org
http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical