Re: Comment on openEHR-EHR-CLUSTER.inspection-skin-wound.v1 archetype

[Otavio Silva <otavio_uff104@yahoo.com.br>]

    Dear all,

    I have not found an archetype of the body parts. Various archetypes could refer to it (like the wounds archetype) and I think it might be an important issue to unify the body part ontologies in order to limit physicians "criativity"...

    I am just missing it, or I just don't know how to search the repositories?

    If it just doesn't exist I am volunteer to make it, a quick search in Google sent me to an interesting model, or something to begin with:

    http://wwwn.cdc.gov/oiics/Trees/BodyPart.aspx

    Thanks in advance...

    Otavio

2010/2/4 Otavio Silva <otaviocsilva@gmail.com>

   Dear all,

   I would like to ask you to consider the inclusion in the "type of wound" of "animal agression".

   Because this kind of wound has proper features that should be differentiated of all the rest and so incluiding would avoid of making another archetype almost identical to openEHR-EHR-CLUSTER.inspection-skin-wound.v1 just to consider those wounds made by animals...

   Thanks in advance,

   Otavio 

--
Otavio C. da Silva
Linux user: # 495191
Ubuntu user: # 28559

_______________________________________________
openEHR-clinical mailing list
openEHR-clinical@openehr.org
http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical