Skip to Navigation | Skip to Content

openEHR-Clinical mailing list archives

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re openEHR and progress in 2009- a clinicians perspective

  • To: For openEHR clinical discussions <openehr-clinical@openehr.org>
  • Subject: Re openEHR and progress in 2009- a clinicians perspective
  • From: "Shannon Tony (Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust)" <tony.shannon@nhs.net>
  • Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:36:20 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US, en-GB
  • Acceptlanguage: en-US, en-GB
  • Thread-index: AQHKgxQgdQ6gqGmEiE6UKtIdfZdZUA==
  • Thread-topic: Re openEHR and progress in 2009- a clinicians perspective

Dear Colleagues,

As 2009 draws to a close I wanted to reflect back on some of the themes 
we explored at the start of the year to gauge progress made this year.
In doing so it seems important to mention the challenging times that 
2009 has meant to lot of people all over the globe, which if anything 
has demonstrated how very interdependant we all now are.

Earlier in the year I shared a view as to what the openEHR clinical 
community had expressed a want/need in pursuing in 2009 and beyond.
http://www.openehr.org/mailarchives/openehr-clinical/msg01306.html

Over the course of this year, slowly but steadily progress has been 
made in a number of these areas that we can be pretty happy with I 
think.
So allow me to briefly recap on some of the agreed priorities and 
related progress in 2009....

1-improve communication & educational materials about openEHR
As ever the areas of communication and educational material has work to 
do, the openEHR mailing lists and wiki being the main stay of 
communication and material with Google Wave under exploration of late.
You may have already seen the very open and honest communication from 
David Ingram (Chair of the openEHR Foundation) posted to openehr.org 
over the weekend.
http://www.openehr.org/295-OE.html?branch=1&language=1
Given the lack of any dedicated Foundation resource for these 
activities, which helps explain the challenge at this time, it may be 
most fair to say that there has been some progress with more work to 
do, a theme which I'll return to as I close.

2-clearer mechanisms for clinicians to get involved & network around 
openEHRs work

The release of the openEHR Clinical Knowledge Manager (CKM) in April 
2009 I believe was a major milestone for openEHR.
http://www.openehr.org/knowledge
Now that the CKM is publicly available, I find it a very helpful place 
to explain to others who are trying to better understand the mission of 
openEHR and "what are archetypes?".
In many ways the idea of coordinating a global audience to agree on 
clinical concepts and definitions may have seemed a near impossible 
task at the start of the year..
I think the steady progress that has been made by all those involved in 
CKM (now over 400 users in 50 countries) already demonstrate the huge 
potential that a community effort can accomplish in this field.
Many thanks to all those involved, particularly the small number of 
editors who have helped to coral and coordinate this challenging effort 
(anyone interested in considering a role as an editor please let me 
know)

The online poll/vote in July 2009 on the "Top 10 archetypes for use in 
an Emergency" was another useful demonstration of the value of 
harnessing our collective intelligence to make decisions.
http://www.openehr.org/wiki/display/healthmod/Poll+Results+-+Top+10+archetypes+for+use+in+an+Emergency
The top 10 archetypes selected contain some of the most key of clinical 
concepts, so tackling them was always going to take time.
Thankfully important progress has been made in these areas with work to 
be done on concepts like Medication and Allergy. I hope to get an 
update from the Archetype Editorial Group on where we are in the New 
Year, so we can complete this effort in 2010.

3-tools for the clinicians to develop openEHR solutions (archetypes, 
templates, UI etc)
The public release of the open source OpenEHR Reference Framework and 
Application in June 2009 was another key milestone for openEHR.
http://opereffa.chime.ucl.ac.uk/
Again, in the context of limited resource and a very small team, UCL 
CHIME have managed to make available online a tool that I can show 
clinical colleagues a very simple, clinically relevant, documentation 
tool that exposes openEHR archetypes, SNOMED CT, User Interface issues 
for debate and discussion. This has been a great help to me in 
promoting the important work of openEHR.
Its been good to see the interest that this openEHR effort has 
generated within the NHS and wider afield as there is a steady 
international increase in appetite for these type of tools. (will be 
interested in any feedback from those busy folk who have downloaded for 
their own local efforts).
The open source nature of this framework is clearly important to the 
effort, though further work needs to be done to find the right funding 
mechanism for this and other open source tools the community requires.

4-clearer mechanisms around archetype, template governance etc

My sense is that the CKM development and poll vote for Top 10 vote etc 
have offered a preliminary start to the challenge of international 
governance of archetypes, etc.
In this weeks update from the openEHR Chairman, David Ingram makes 
clear that the board is actively seeking and open to all suggestions on 
this.. with opportunities being explored to improve on this via IHTSDO 
etc.
In that context, the joint statement in September 2009 between the 
openEHR Foundation and IHTSDO foundation was another important 
development during the year.
http://www.ihtsdo.org/news/article/view/ihtsdo-and-openehr-begin-collaborative-work-programme/

The recent discussion/plans for an openEHR community meeting during 
2010 (be that at Medinfo or elsewhere next year) may be an important 
time to help progress the discussion and debate that is needed to get 
this right. I'd be particularly grateful for any ideas/views on how we 
can improve on the governance issue..
For example, as 2010 commences I plan to refresh a discussion, 
involving the clinical community looking again at clinical requirements 
to help steer the openEHR technical community (in areas such as how 
archetypes/templates/UI should interrelate etc) where open discussion 
and debate might be helpful.

5-additional work to ensure close fit between openEHR solutions and 
Decision
Support/Business Rules engines.

To date from my viewpoint, this remains an ambition, which I hope we 
will see realised to some extent as openEHR implementations grow and 
mature. Rong Chens excellent PhD recently published offers a view of 
the future in this field.
http://www.openehr.org/shared-resources/publications/archetypes.html


To close, I wanted to mention that after 5 years at NHS Connecting for 
Health, promoting clinical leadership, process improvement and health 
IT standards (ie openEHR) I have made a move on in recent weeks.  I 
hope my move will allow me time for a couple of things.
Firstly I am now helping my hospital base with more Informatics 
leadership that is required to tackle some key service improvement 
pressures that need to be addressed. Within that environment, I am 
already preparing a case for a local project - to foster collaboration 
between interested parties, aimed at development on an open record 
architecture platform. While this is a longterm goal in an environment 
with short/medium and long term priorities, I hope it will be an 
important development in linking frontline pressures with international 
best practice.
In addition, I hope that the move will allow me time to work with UCL 
CHIME to more directly help the mission of the openEHR Foundation, in 
particular sharing the learning and progress we are making.
You might be interested in this short and snappy screencast on the 
"Healthcare Change Challenge & the role of openEHR" that I have put 
together in recent days.
http://www.screencast-o-matic.com/watch/cQlFXHhtt
Hope you might find it of interest and please feedback your views so 
that I can work on progressing and improving on this communication and 
educational resource in the New Year.


So in the context of the challenging year that 2009 was, I hope you'll 
agree that important progress has been made, which bodes very well for 
the future of openEHR..
As ever, keen for views/discussion/debate on these points.... in the 
New Year perhaps...

With best wishes for your Christmas and looking forward to 2010,

Kind regards,


Tony

Dr. Tony Shannon
Consultant in Emergency Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospitals
Clinical Lead for Informatics,          Leeds Teaching Hospitals
Honorary Research Fellow, University College London
Chair, Clinical Review Board, openEHR Foundation
+44.789.988 5068            tony.shannon@nhs.net

********************************************************************************************************************

This message may contain confidential information. If you are not the 
intended recipient please inform the
sender that you have received the message in error before deleting it.
Please do not disclose, copy or distribute information in this e-mail 
or take any action in reliance on its contents:
to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.

Thank you for your co-operation.

NHSmail is the secure email and directory service available for all NHS 
staff in England and Scotland
NHSmail is approved for exchanging patient data and other sensitive 
information with NHSmail and GSI recipients
NHSmail provides an email address for your career in the NHS and can be 
accessed anywhere
For more information and to find out how you can switch, visit 
www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/nhsmail

********************************************************************************************************************