Re: HL7 too expensive, too complex and inconsistent
it's hardly a new thing. There's been similar reports in Australia in the past.....
... I disagree with some statements about HL7, but I doubt if anyone could write an article that everyone would agree with all the content.
I think the report is a turkey - it makes statements about HL7 that the HL7 people disagree with, and makes statements about openEHR the openEHR people disagree with - and not in a "we interpret things differently" way, but more in a "wow they really missed the point way"..
I mean starting the openEHR section with a discussion about the open source movement so completely misses the point that I worry about anything else in the report..
It reads to me like a bunch of web 2.0 e-business paradigm shifting consultants who got asked to write a report on e-health, so they've downloaded some organisational 'mission' statements, did a survey and then wrote it up. I think its level of insight is marginal.
Andrew _______________________________________________ openEHR-clinical mailing list openEHR-clinical@openehr.org http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical