| Key: |
SPEC-284
|
| Type: |
Change Request
|
| Status: |
Closed
|
| Resolution: |
Fixed
|
| Priority: |
Major
|
| Reporter: |
Thomas Beale
|
| Votes: |
0
|
| Watchers: |
0
|
|
If you were logged in you would be able to see more operations.
|
|
|
| Change Description: |
This problem should be corrected as follows:
- treat the XML-schema as being correct (it has the more expected plural spellings of the attributes). It also corresponds to the AOM and thus ISO/EN13606 form of the names.
- correct the ADL specification to use the plural spelling for term_definitions, constraint_definitions, term_bindings and constraint_bindings sections in the ontology.
- correct the archetype tools to allow both spellings in ADL archetypes, and to silently convert singular -> plural on saving.
- correct spellings in examples in Architecture Overview specification
This problem should be corrected as follows:
- treat the XML-schema as being correct (it has the more expected plural spellings of the attributes). It also corresponds to the AOM and thus ISO/EN13606 form of the names.
- correct the ADL specification to use the plural spelling for term_definitions, constraint_definitions, term_bindings and constraint_bindings sections in the ontology.
- correct the archetype tools to allow both spellings in ADL archetypes, and to silently convert singular -> plural on saving.
- correct spellings in examples in Architecture Overview specification
|
| Impact Analysis: |
Apart from minor changes to the specifications, there will be some minor changes required in the archetype editing tools.
|
| Analyst: |
Rong Chen and Thomas Beale
|
|
Alessandro Torrisi (Unusual Visions, implementing at Medical Centre Alkmaar, The Netherlands) reported the following inconsistency.
The ADL 1.4 specification mentions subsections under the archetype ontology section named term_binding and constraint_binding (both singular). In the AOM specification, these attributes are not defined (already raised as an issue), although there are invariants that imply the presence of attributes term_bindings and constraint_bindings (both plural).
In ADL archetypes, these two attributes occur in a small number of archetypes, and are named in the singular.
In the published AOM XML-schema, these attributes are spelled in the plural form. XML archetypes include these attributes named in the plural.
There is a similar minor inconsistency in the attribute names term_definition(s) and constraint_definition(s) in the ADL 1.4 specification; again both of these should be in the plural. They already appear in the plural in ADL archetypes, the XML-schema, and XML archetypes, so this anomaly is essentially just a typographical error in the ADL specification only.
The architectural overview document also includes a couple of instances of these spelling errors in examples.
|
|
Description
|
Alessandro Torrisi (Unusual Visions, implementing at Medical Centre Alkmaar, The Netherlands) reported the following inconsistency.
The ADL 1.4 specification mentions subsections under the archetype ontology section named term_binding and constraint_binding (both singular). In the AOM specification, these attributes are not defined (already raised as an issue), although there are invariants that imply the presence of attributes term_bindings and constraint_bindings (both plural).
In ADL archetypes, these two attributes occur in a small number of archetypes, and are named in the singular.
In the published AOM XML-schema, these attributes are spelled in the plural form. XML archetypes include these attributes named in the plural.
There is a similar minor inconsistency in the attribute names term_definition(s) and constraint_definition(s) in the ADL 1.4 specification; again both of these should be in the plural. They already appear in the plural in ADL archetypes, the XML-schema, and XML archetypes, so this anomaly is essentially just a typographical error in the ADL specification only.
The architectural overview document also includes a couple of instances of these spelling errors in examples. |
Show » |
|
Correct inconsistencies in naming of term_definitions, constraint_definitions, term_bindings and constraint_bindings attributes in XML-schema and specifications